I didn't understand the psychology of bank CEO's who destroyed storied institutions by turning all their capital into risky securities until I played Monopoly with my four-year-old daughter. My daughter loves Monopoly, and even though she doesn't really understand it she usually wins. That's because after about half an hour, she gets bored and wants to stop. We add up the money and property and she often has the most. In our last game she tried a new strategy - she didn't buy anything. She still won. If you play for the very short term, Monopoly is essentially a game of chance. Whether you win depends entirely on when you stop. Finally, as my wife observed, if you play (markets, monopoly) for the short-term, you're not invested in the future - not committed to preserving anything, doing what's best to keep the institution going, etc.
*These figures alone will enable the economic historian of the future to describe the unhealthy prosperity of 1929 and the inevitable grief and suffering that followed in the succeeding years--grief and suffering that overwhelmed and carried away not merely the speculative gains of those who participated in the speculative debauch ... but eventually the operating profits of every business in the country no matter how unrelated to stock exchanges.
Sam Rayburn's introdution to H.R. Rep 73-1383, 73rd Cong. 2nd Sess. 1934, 1934 WL 1290
No comments:
Post a Comment